söndag 25 september 2016

Caroline Glicks förklaring av Obamas avtal med Israel

Caroline Glicks förklaring av Obamas avtal med Israel. Kunde Netanyahu ha sagt nej? Komplicerat förstås, här anledningarna.

Obama’s denouement


bhobb 

The Memorandum of Understanding that President Barack Obama concluded last week with Israel regarding US military aid to Israel for the next decade is classic Obama.

Since he entered office nearly eight years ago, Obama’s foreign policy has always sought to kill two birds with one stone. On the one hand, his policies are geared toward fundamentally transforming the US’s global posture. On the other, they work to weaken if not entirely neutralize his congressional opponents at home.

Obamas FN-tal lögn och okunnighet. Mot internationell lag.

Obama, Ban och TT uttrycker samma antisemitiska fantasier emot internationell lag..

Obama calls Yesha 'Palestinian,' contrary to Oslo and Int'l Law

President Obama calls Judea and Samaria 'Palestinian' - in contradiction to international law.
Hillel Fendel, 



Barack Obama
Reuters

Amid the countless words of analysis of US President Obama's address to the United Nations last week, precious little has been said about his use of the words "Palestinian lands." The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) is apparently the first and only organization to comment on it.
"Surely Israelis and Palestinians will be better off if Palestinians reject incitement and recognize the legitimacy of Israel ... [and if] Israel recognizes that it cannot permanently occupy and settle Palestinian land," Obama said.
The ZOA says that using the words "Palestinian land" to refer to Judea and Samaria "prejudges the issue of sovereignty and borders, and is not accordance with international law, which designates Judea/Samaria as unallocated territory, without a recognized sovereign."
Over the past century, Judea and Samaria (collectively known as Yesha) has been under the control of the Ottoman Empire, the British Mandate, Jordan and Israel – but never under "Palestinian" control. In fact, no such Arab country has ever existed in history. Only since 1993 has there been a "Palestinian Authority," but it was specifically not granted control or authority over areas of Jewish settlement. For Obama to say that Israel cannot  "settle Palestinian land," therefore, is a total misnomer.
The ZOA noted that Obama's use of this term "unjustly designates the biblical, religious, and historical heartland of the Jewish people for millennia, before the Arab conquest of the region in the seventh century, as belonging to Palestinian Arabs."
The ZOA acknowledges that Judea and Samaria are disputed areas, "but it is also important to note that Israel has better claim [to them] in law than any other party."
As has been noted many times, to the apathy of most of the world, Judea and Samaria - the area termed the "West Bank" - were earmarked for Jewish settlement in 1920 at the San Remo Conference. This decision was then reaffirmed by the League of Nations and the United Nations, and has never been superseded by an internationally binding agreement.
Jordan's assumption of control over the area from 1949 until 1967 was never recognized by any country in the world, except for Great Britain. The Arab League specifically negated it. Judea/Samaria is thus "unallocated territory under international law," the ZOA affirms, and thus Israel's control of it does not impede on the sovereign territory of any other entity.
Even the Oslo Accords do not prohibit Israeli residence and construction in these territories. On the contrary, states the ZOA: they "provide for Israeli and Palestinian building in zones under their respective controls. Oslo also lists this as a final status issue, to be negotiated by the parties themselves, and Israel is entitled to assert its right for its citizens to live and build in these territories until such time as a peace settlement is reached."
Israel has consistently called for direct negotiations with the PA, but the latter has refused for the past eight years – except for two meetings held in the space of one week over six years ago.


torsdag 22 september 2016

Bolton och den Internationella domstolen.

Den Internationella Domstolen med dess ovalda medlemmar vars beslut inte har med laglig rätt att göra, förklaras med svidande skärpa av Bolton. Det är en del av FNs lekstuga och som Generalförsamlingens uttalanden är det enbart åsikter, inte lag.

Bolton warns: Hillary will sign America up to the ICC

Former American UN Ambassador John Bolton says ICC has no legitimacy - warns a Clinton administration would give it some.
Arutz Sheva Staff, 

QUICK WATCH | 0:47
John Bolton
John Bolton
 Shurat HaDin
Former United States Ambassador to the UN John Bolton has predicted that if Hillary Clinton becomes president, she will sign the US up to the International Criminal Court at the Hague.
Speaking at Shurat HaDin's "Towards a New Law of War Conference" Monday, Bolton delivered a typically scathing critique of the current White House's foreign policy.
"Iran learned that if it waits long enough the Americans will give up, remove the sanctions and do whatever they want," Bolton said, attacking the Obama administration's policy of appeasement towards Tehran. "International sanctions against state sponsors of terrorism are not meaningful, since they're always removing them."
Turning to the ICC, Bolton called on democratic nations not to engage with the court, branding it unaccountable, illegitimate, impotent and biased.
"We must not cooperate with the ICC - that gives them legitimacy," he said. "The ICC is an illusion. A bunch of people in black robes will never be able to stop the brutal dictators who carry out mass murders."

"No one elected them, there are no checks and balances. It is in practice an ad hoc tribunal to attack African leaders," he continued, adding that his "happiest moment" in service of the US government was the day he removed America's signature from th Rome Statute.

"Fortunately, Obama didn't resign until now, as he knows he won't have a majority in the Senate in favor," Bolton stated.
But "if Clinton is elected, she will rejoin Americans to the ICC and resign the Rome Statute," he warned.

Bolton also accused commentators and leaders of perverting international law for their own ends.
"Most things which are considered 'international law' aren't law at all. They don't have any democratic legitimacy," he said. "This harms the sovereignty of states and is fixed by people who weren't elected by anyone."


Varifrån kommer Palestinska Mandaternas Araber?

Jag har tidigare lagt ut artiklar som Relandis reseskildring från 1695 länk. En annan översikt på länk. Här hänvisas till en detaljerad artikel som borde läsas av våra sagoberättande massmedia. En annan artikel i ämnet: länk
.

Were the Arabs Indigenous to Mandatory Palestine?

by Sheree Roth
Middle East Quarterly
Fall 2016 (view PDF)

William B. Ziff's little remembered The Rape of Palestine, published in 1938, adds an important first-hand source to these recent studies. None of the modern authors used Ziff as a source, so this is new information to present-day analysts.

his Rape of Palestine was considered by the British Foreign Office "a violent and offensive book," and for years afterward, the British monitored the Zionist writings and speeches of this "unscrupulous gangster," fearful that his audiences were "lapping this poison up."[7]
The thrust of Ziff's book is on British policy in Palestine during the mandate period, but what is especially interesting today are his comments on the migration of Arabs and the squelching of Jewish immigration by the British. The following extensive quotes show the value of his work. 
(Klicka länken över.)

tisdag 20 september 2016

Tusen och en natt à la Ban, Obama.

Idiotiskt tal av Obama i FN. Jämför med ki-Moons. Bägge berättade hur  bra de var, bägge talade om ett helt  okänt land, "palestina" : hade man frågat när det uppstod hade de inte haft en aning. eftersom det aldrig skett, Abbas och Arafat vägrade förhandla fram fred och stod helt fast vid Fatahs näst senaste stadgar, de sista sade kort att vad som sades i näst senaste gällde mycket tydligt 


Artikel (12) Fullständig befrielse av Palestina, och utrotande av den sionistiska ekonomiska, politiska, militära och kulturella existensen.
Artikel (19) Väpnad kamp är en strategi och inte en taktik, och det palestinska arabiska folkets väpnade revolution är en avgörande faktor i befrielsekampen att utrota den sionistiska existensen, och denna kamp kommer inte att upphöra innan den sionistiska staten rivs och Palestina är helt befriat.

Article (12) Complete liberation of Palestine, and eradication of Zionist economic, political, military and cultural existence.
Article (19) Armed struggle is a strategy and not a tactic, and the Palestinian Arab People's armed revolution is a decisive factor in the liberation fight and in uprooting the Zionist existence, and this struggle will not cease unless the Zionist state is demolished and Palestine is completely liberated.


Vad Obama skulle bli överraskad att höra det!

Israels ambassadör Danon gav förklaring; http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/218077

Israeli Ambassador Danon blasts UN 'obsession with Israel'

After UN Secretary-General says 50 years of 'occupation' is 'madness', Ambassador Danon says the UN 'obsession' with Israel must end.
Shai Landesman, 


Danny Danon and Ban Ki-moon
Shahar Ezran
Israel’s Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon reacted harshly to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s opening address at the UN General Assembly. The Secretary-General decided to take the opportunity to criticize Israel, saying: “Ten years of illegal settlement expansion and fifty years of occupation. This is madness. The Palestinians cannot continue to live under Israeli occupation.”
Ambassador Danon reacted by saying that “The real madness belongs to the UN. Instead of focusing on Palestinian terror and incitement, and instead of compelling [Palestinian Authority President] Mahmoud Abbas to return to the negotiating table, the Secretary-General chose to criticize Israel once again. This is an obsession with Israel and it must end.”
“At a time when Palestinian terror is on the rise in Israel, the Secretary-General chose to criticize us and ignore the direct responsibility of Abbas and the Palestinian leadership who continue to incite towards terror.”
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has repeatedly said in every opportunity he gets that he is willing to meet with Abbas "anytime, anywhere" to discuss peace. Abbas, for his part, refuses to meet for negotiations unless certain "preconditions" are met, namely, that Israel makes concessions before negotiations even begin.
Secretary-General Ban, apparently, still chooses to focus on the "occupation" and "settlements" as the perceived main source of the problem.


Trump och Judarna.

Trump har i svenska offentliga massmedia  drabbats av samma vinkling som i amerikanska demokratiska media, d.v.s. total support av Obama/Hillarys vansinnespåhitt som deras nya religion upp till att starta kärnvapenkrig genom att överösa Iran med dollars. Medbloggaren på http://mxp.blogg.se/2016/august/trump-video-varje-jude-maste-se-2.html visar YouTubevideon  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2G9MR1n7Es



Vänsterns uppfattning.
Alla som är förpestade av TTs vänstervinkling av verkligheten lär få en chock av dessa fakta. att de är triviala fakta kan de inte förneka, bara försöka tysta ner som  TT och deras efterapningar. 

Den minst sagt komplicerade uppfattningen är av många amerikanska judars support av Israelhataren Obama vars ideer i
ämnet delas av Hillary. Därför sägs på videon att den måste ses av varje jude. Jag tror alla måste se den vare sej de känner något om "jude" eller inte. Jag är vanlig svensk som inte visste något om judar före mitt första av många besök i Israel i början av 7o-talet. Att jag fick mycket fler vänner där än i Sverige är bara ett faktum.

Att jag mer och mer insett att den västerländska kulturen är helt judeokristen är jag inte ensam om, att en del kristna har försökt ersätta sitt judiska ursprung med total vilsenhet ser vi, med svenska präster som försöker avlägsna judiska symboler i kyrkorna. 

Vilket påminner om en story: en gammal jude förirrade sej in i en kyrka, prelaten blev mäkta förargad och bad honom avlägsna sej, han hade inget att göra där. Juden tittade upp, gick långsamt fram till predikstolen, tittade upp på Jesusbilden, tog ner den och sa:  "vi är inte välkomna här".

.

torsdag 15 september 2016

Svenska och europeiska kvinnor attackerar¨Israel.

Jämför med de enorma leveranserna från Israel, http://www.cogat.idf.il/894-en/Matpash.aspx
inser man att showen från några vänsterfruntimmer i EU är helt meningslös vad gäller leveranser till Gaza.

Women's flotilla sets sail for Gaza



 new women’s flotilla aimed at violating the Israeli naval blockade on Gaza left on Wednesday from the Spanish city of Barcelona,Al Jazeera reported.
Two sailing boats, Amal and Zaytouna, with 11 women on board each, sailed off under the banner "The Women's Boat to Gaza", according to the report.
The passengers include Swedish European Parliament Member Malin Bjork and Dr Fouzia Hassan of Malaysia. They aim to reach Gaza by early October.
"We are carrying food and medicine on the boat that will be distributed to Gazans upon arrival," Zohar Chamberlain Regev, a spokeswoman of the initiative, told Al Jazeera.
"But mainly we are carrying a message of hope and solidarity, because we think Gazans want that most of all."
She said she had high hopes that the flotilla would not be stopped by the Israeli navy and reach the destination.
"We know that we are not a threat to Israel. We are not heading to an Israeli port so they have no reason to stop us," she told Al Jazeera.
Last time the Women's Boat to Gaza attempted to enter Gaza in 2015, the Israeli navy boarded and took over its vessel, Marianne. The boat was taken to the Israeli city of Ashdod to have its contents inspected.
The women’s initiative is one of several recent attempts to break Israel's naval blockade on Gaza, which a UN team has said is completely legal.
The first, and perhaps most famous flotilla, was the 2010 Mavi Marmara flotilla. When the ships taking part refused to stop IDF soldiers boarded, upon which they were assaulted by the "humanitarian" activists wielding knives, iron bars and other lethal weapons.
The soldiers were forced to open fire to save their lives, killing ten of their assailants and sparking an international media backlash.
Despite the supposed "humanitarian" aims of the effort, Israel found the flotilla in fact was not carrying any humanitarian aid, or any other type of supplies for that matter.