torsdag 23 september 2010

TT översätter betydligt sämre än Google.

Jämför

TT AFP

"Otroligt våld" på Ship to Gaza

Israels militär använde ”otroligt våld” under bordningen av hjälpkonvojen Ship to Gaza i maj då nio turkiska aktivister sköts till döds, enligt en utredning från FN:s råd för mänskliga rättigheter som blev känd på onsdagen.

Utredningen slår fast att bordningen stred mot internationell lag och mot de mänskliga rättigheterna och att det finns klara bevis för att stödja åtal mot Israel på flera punkter: uppsåtligt dödande, tortyr eller omänsklig behandling, uppsåtligt orsakande av stort lidande eller allvarlig kroppsskada.

”Uppförandet från Israels militär och annan personal mot passagerarna på flottan var inte bara oproportionerligt för tillfället men visade också nivåer av totalt onödigt och otroligt våld”, skrev utredningen.

Chefen för Israels militära styrkor, Gabi Ashkenazi, har tidigare försvarat sina soldaters bruk av dödligt våld när han förhördes av en israelisk kommission som separat utredde händelsen i somras. Även premiärminister Benjamin Netanyahu och försvarsminister Ehud Barak försvarade soldaterna inför den israeliska kommissionen.

Enligt FN:s utredande kommission, som inledde sitt arbete i mitten av augusti, innebar bordningen ett brott mot krigets lagar, enligt Genèvekonventionen.

UN Gaza aid probe finds 'clear evidence' against Israel

UN Gaza aid probe finds 'clear evidence' against Israel
GENEVA (AFP) – A UN probe said Wednesday there was "clear evidence to support prosecutions" against Israel for "wilful killing" and torture committed when its troops stormed a Gaza-bound aid flotilla in May.
In a scathing report, it also threw out Israel's argument that activists on the aid ship were violent thereby justifying the decision by Israeli soldiers to open fire, adding that some were the victim of actions "consistent with...summary execution."
The inquiry ordered by the UN Human Rights Council said Israel's military used "unnecessary violence" in the incident and committed acts that "constituted grave violations of human rights law and international humanitarian law."
There was "clear evidence to support prosecutions" of crimes against international humanitarian law including "wilful killing; torture or inhuman treatment; and wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health," it said.
Israel's foreign ministry spokesman could not be reached on Wednesday night, the start of the Sukkot Jewish holiday.
But from the outset, Israeli officials have rejected the inquiry mandated by the Human Rights Council as biased but is backing another, separate probe set up by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon on the incident which left nine Turkish activists dead.
Israel has insisted that it acted in line with international law, arguing that it had the right to retaliate against ships attempting to breach its blockade of the impoverished Gaza Strip.
However, the probe said Israel's enforcement of a blockade was itself unlawful, since Gaza was suffering from a humanitarian crisis on the day of the deadly raid.
"For this reason alone, the blockade is unlawful and cannot be sustained in law. This is so regardless of the grounds on which it is sought to justify the legality of the blockade," said the report of the inquiry, which is due to be presented to the rights council on Monday.
Rejecting Israel's justification of its soldiers' decision to open fire, it said it found that even those who did not attempt to stop Israeli soldiers from boarding the aid ships "received injuries, including fatal injuries."
"It is apparent that no effort was made to minimise injuries at certain states of the operation and that the use of live fire was done in an extensive and arbitrary manner," said the inquiry.
"The circumstances of the killing of at least six of the passengers were in a manner consistent with an extra-legal, arbitrary and summary execution," it added.
"The conduct of the Israeli military and other personnel towards the flotilla passengers was not only disproportionate to the occasion but demonstrated levels of totally unnecessary and incredible violence," said the probe.
The fact-finding mission, chaired by Karl Hudson-Phillips, former judge of the International Criminal Court in The Hague, had travelled to Turkey, Jordan and Britain to interview witnesses and officials for the probe.
Desmond de Silva, former chief prosecutor of the Sierra Leone War Crimes Tribunal, and Shanthi Dairiam, as Malaysian human rights expert, are the other members of the panel.
Andra tidningar roade sig med att i stället skriva "ofattbart våld" som översättning av "wilfull killing", avsiktligt dödande. Ytterligt påtagligt försök till demonisering av Israel och avsiktligt lögnaktig översättning.

Åtminstone skriver de att det var terrorister som dödades, pressens kodord är "aktivister".
Detta gällde alltså terrorister från en erkänd turkisk Terroristgrupp IHH där en del hade sagt att de kom som självmordsmördare, och där de kom i en illegal skock med båtar som Erdogan och IHH olagligt hade använt, tillsammans med 600 mänskliga sköldar, för att bryta en legal blockad mot terroristgruppen Hamas.

För vidare analys av vad rapporten gällde, se bloggen FiM.

Som där står är denna rapporten en ihopafantiserad rapport av samma grupp som presterade Goldstonerapporten - som rapporterade om Gazakriget utan att hitta en enda av de 10000 raketer/granater, 40 OM DAGEN veckan före kriget,  som föregick och gav anledning til kriget. I rapportkravet skulle man också ta upp vad som hände efter kriget, vilket Goldstone och hans gäng totalt "glömt bort". 425 har till dags dato avskjutits från terroristerna i Gaza efter det senate stilleståndet och fallit över judiska kvinnor och barn - och även en del araber som flytt från Gaza, i södra Israel, komplett folkrättsvidrigt, men något FN eller TT inte har något att anmärka emot. Ingen har heller klagat på det ytterligt klara krigsbrottet att Hamas avlossat två granater med fosfor mot Israel - vilket är en helt annan sak än laglig användning av vit fosfor som Röda Korset godkänt. FN anmärker mycket mer om att Israel inte matar Gazanerna md tillräckligt bra mat, även om Gazas ekonomi första kvartalet i år steg med 13% och där är många rapporter om sjuklig fetma hos Gazaner. Jämfört med Sveriges utveckling på omkring 5%.

På en del ställen nämns att också Ban Ki-Moon inte tror ett ögonblick på denna rapporten från den alltid starkt israelfientliga Human Rights Council utan har startat en egen - men TT tror och ser till att svenska folket tror.

Radio Free Europes rapport:
Israel Rejects Findings Of UN Rights Probe Of Gaza Flotilla Raid

Sep 23, 2010

Radio Free Europe

http://www.rferl.org/articleprintview/2165779.html

The Israeli government has rejected the findings of a UN Human Rights Council investigation that concluded that Israel's military acted illegally and with disproportionate levels of violence during a raid on an aid flotilla to the Gaza Strip that left nine people dead.

The Foreign Ministry denounced the report as "biased" against Israel, and noted that Israel was still conducting its own investigation and was also participating in a probe backed by the UN secretary-general's office.

In its report, the UN Human Rights Council said there was "clear evidence" to support potential prosecutions of Israeli officials over the actions of troops who stormed the flotilla in May.

The report also said Israeli soldiers acted with an "unacceptable level of brutality."

Israel says its soldiers acted in self-defense, and that it was within its rights to enforce its blockade of the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.

Eight Turkish activists and one Turkish-American were killed in the Israeli raid.
I början av augusti drog TT och kopieringsgänget till med "den blodiga israeliska räden" och liknande. Läs på den länken - där jämför jag med t.ex. Irak och Afghanistan och Pakistan, där det ingalunda är något ofattbart våld när 600.000 civila muslimer avlivas, bara lite vanligt dödande. Enligt TT. Men särbehandlingen av Israel är en av definitionerna av antisemitism.

Vilka som sitter i Human Rights group Council tja, kolla hur det står till med de mänskliga rättigheterna i de länderna. Obama gick med, enligt honom själv, för att förhindra rapporter av detta slag, men - tja, jag kopierar hela artikeln här eftersom det kräver login:

Obama's human rights fiasco

Posted By Anne Bayefsky Friday, April 3, 2009 - 10:17 PM

Why the U.S. decision to rejoin the U.N. Human Rights Council is self-defeating.

By Anne Bayefsky

The U.N. Human Rights Council is a human rights catastrophe. So why did U.S. President Barack Obama decide this week that the United States would join it?

Next month, the council will hold elections, with U.S. membership a foregone conclusion. This means that the United States will soon be sitting down with Saudi Arabia, Cuba, and China to talk about human rights. Not human rights in Saudi Arabia, Cuba, and China, mind you. But human rights in Israel and the United States.

The Human Rights Council is the United Nations' lead human rights body. Created in 2006 by the General Assembly as a "reformed" Human Rights Commission, the council has taken the worst elements of its predecessor and magnified them. Former U.S. President George W. Bush decided not to join it after various U.S.-suggested reforms -- such as minimal standards of respect for human rights among member states -- were rejected. Now, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, claims that "working from within, we can make the council a more effective forum." The U.S. State Department speaks of future reform.

In other words, the United States is joining a fundamentally flawed body in order to make it something that it isn't. Disingenuous, to say the least. The council already is the reform. Its predecessor lasted half a century, and the same stumbling blocks that prevented fixing of the system in 2006 are still present and more entrenched than ever.  The majority of the members of the U.N. General Assembly are not fully free democracies. Getting serious about democratic rights and freedoms is not their priority.

The council itself is controlled by human rights abusers who like it just the way it is. Membership is determined by distributing seats among five regional groups, with the African and Asian groups holding the majority. In turn, member states of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) hold a majority in each of the African and Asian groups. This gives the OIC the balance of power. When the going gets tough, the single U.S. vote, or the seven votes of the "Western European and Others Group" (WEOG), amount to a hill of beans. Resolutions are continually watered down for the sake of artificial consensus or adopted over the objection of every WEOG member. Just last week, we saw another sorry example of this phenomenon, with the adoption of a resolution on the "defamation of religions." What does restricting free speech in the name of "religion" have to do with protecting individual human rights?

By letting some of the world's worst regimes rub shoulders with its leading democracy, the United States becomes an enabler. These governments don't share Western or universal values. They use the council to: (1) feign interest in human rights, (2) keep the focus on Israel and away from themselves, (3) manufacture victim status, (4) encourage liberal guilt and concomitant financial responsibility, and (5) undermine the universal application of real human rights standards.

The record is incontrovertible. The council has passed more resolutions and decisions condemning Israel than all other 191 U.N. members combined. The council has one (of only ten) formal agenda items dedicated to criticizing Israel.  And one agenda item to consider the human rights of the remaining 99.9 percent of the world's population. There have been 10 regular sessions on human rights for all, and five special sessions to condemn Israel alone. The council excludes only Israel from the key negotiating and information-sharing meetings of every regional group. It has terminated human rights investigations on Belarus, Cuba, Liberia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. And all investigations of "consistent patterns of gross and reliably attested violations of all human rights and all fundamental freedoms" in such states as Iran, Kyrgyzstan, the Maldives, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan have been "discontinued."

Absolutely none of that will change with the United States sitting in the front row, Obama's rhetorical skills notwithstanding. On the contrary, joining this farce means accepting the discriminatory agenda and attending WEOG meetings with a sign reading "no representatives of the Jewish people allowed" hanging on the door.

The Council's one new device -- the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) -- was heralded as introducing a careful examination of all UN states without discrimination. What actually happens is that a series of human-rights abusers congratulate one another, avoid any serious scrutiny, and then denigrate the democracies that agreed to the travesty in the first place.

Ironically, in the name of "engagement" the United States will now repeatedly be drawn into confrontations that could have been avoided. With Canada leaving the council, the European Union spineless in the face of OIC opposition, and the international human rights system now opposed to "naming and shaming," the United States will have to rock the boat if it wants to avoid joining a corrupt consensus.  This will mean voting against OIC-driven resolutions and proposing "controversial" condemnations of any state other than Israel.

President Obama has waded into quicksand, which will drown both U.S. efforts to protect human rights and his sought-after reputation as their champion.

Anne Bayefsky is a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, and Director of the Touro College Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust.
Är du intresserad av hur FN rådbråkar tanken på mänskliga rättigheter följs det väl både på http://www.unwatch.org ochhttp://www.eyeontheun.org/

Säreget - pressen gör precis allt för att tuta i folk vad de tycker, helt distanserat från sanningen, antingen det gäller SD eller Israel. Denna Pravdaisering har vi hört i många nog artiklar om SD den sista veckan, och det gäller i minst lika hög grad Israel - tänk på det i fortsättningen!

Att eka TT-skrönor är ett självklart brott mot Pressens Etiska Regler som klart säger
2. Var kritisk mot nyhetskällorna. Kontrollera sakuppgifter så noggrant som omständigheterna medger, även om de tidigare har publicerats. Ge läsaren/mottagaren möjlighet att skilja mellan faktaredovisning och kommentarer.
.


NSk751 Sk751 Lt751 Lt738 Nsk738 NSk727 Lt727 Sk727 LT710 NSk710 SvD085 vg601

....

Inga kommentarer:

Skicka en kommentar